Three European cases—Hungary’s family-protection statute, ECHR treatment of crosses, and Commission language guidelines—are fronts in a single semantic war over demographic sovereignty.
The plate presents an evidence table in which family protection is recoded as demographic sovereignty, crosses become passive artifacts, and public-policy language erases words.
SteelMan: Institutional language and court doctrine can reframe national demographic and religious claims as rights violations.
Cut: Three cases do not establish a coordinated war. The plate does not open the statutes or judgments.